WebFracturing: Illuminating Act 13 and Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 116 W. VA. L. REV. 819, 826 (2014) (focusing on “how assumed facts were used to justify the plurality opinion” in the 2013 Robinson Township opinion). I also did not support the conferral of standing upon municipalities – which are otherwise WebCommonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Dondre James Smith Page 1 of 2 CASE INFORMATION ... Disposition: Arresting Agency: West Hempfield Township Police Dept Arrest Date: 04/07/2024 OTN: R 459503-2 File Date: 04/07/2024 Complaint No.: WH-23-01789-677 Incident No.: WH-23-01789 Disposition Date: County: Active Township: West Hempfield …
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN …
WebRobinson Township. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PA Supreme Court), 83 A.3d 901 (2013) [Note: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has 7 members; Justice Castille wrote on behalf of a 3-person plurality. Justice Baer concurred. Justice Saylor dissented, and was joined by 2 other justices. This is a highly redacted version of a 120 page opinion. WebAug 18, 2015 · Robinson Township v. Commonwealth. deci-sion. This Note argues that exempting these same operations under Pennsyl-vania’s Public Utility Code is not unconstitutional. While Act 13’s exemp-tions operate in a similar manner, the Note explains that exempting opera-tions on a caseby-case basis is the approach most tailored to the … dave ava
Robinson Township v. Commonwealth and Implications …
WebMar 23, 2014 · In Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held unconstitutional major parts of Pennsylvania’s “Act 13” — a 2012 oil and gas law designed to facilitate the development of natural gas from Marcellus Shale. WebDec 21, 2013 · Robinson Township and others filed a lawsuit against the state in Commonwealth Court, claiming that Act 13 violated various provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution. In its July 2012 decision, Commonwealth Court dismissed most of the petitioners’ claims but held Section 3215 (b) (4) and Section 3304 to be unconstitutional. WebNov 3, 2015 · Commonwealth.”16 C. Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Lower Court Decision Robinson Township and six other municipalities, two individuals, an environmental organization, and a physician filed an action against the state challenging Act 13 as inconsistent with the Environmental Rights dave bhavika md